By Fasuyi Tolulope Samuel
The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) has recently taken a bold stance on online interactions, declaring insults and curses as criminal offenses under cyberbullying laws.
This announcement, made by the Force Public Relations Officer, Prince Olumuyiwa Adejobi, via his verified X handle on Friday, has stirred controversy about the boundaries of freedom of speech in Nigeria and the role of law enforcement in upholding or restricting it.
Adejobi clarified that “raining direct curses on someone online is cyberbullying, not expression of freedom or criticism,” emphasizing that such behavior constitutes a punishable criminal offense.
While the officer’s intent may be to foster civility in online discourse, the move has raised eyebrows among citizens who question its broader implications.
A Threat to Free Speech?
The Nigerian Constitution guarantees freedom of expression under Section 39, but many Nigerians feel this right exists only on paper.
Critics argue that labeling insults and curses as criminal offenses could stifle free speech, turning a platform for public discourse into a tool for silencing dissent. Where does the line between criticism and cyberbullying truly lie? Who determines whether a statement is a curse, an insult, or a legitimate critique?
The ambiguity surrounding these definitions raises concerns about potential misuse by authorities. Could this policy be wielded selectively, targeting those who challenge government officials or speak out against societal issues?
Protecting the People or the Powerful?
Skepticism lingers over the police’s motivation behind this crackdown. Historically, Nigeria’s law enforcement agencies have been accused of prioritizing the protection of the political elite over the general populace.
This new directive could deepen that perception, with citizens wondering if the police are focusing on securing the comfort of the powerful rather than ensuring justice for all.
While curbing online toxicity is commendable, the implementation of such policies in a society fraught with systemic bias leaves much to be desired. Will ordinary citizens be jailed for minor offenses while those in power get a free pass for similar or worse behavior?
The Way Forward
As the debate rages, the NPF must tread carefully to avoid alienating the very people it is meant to serve. Balancing the need for decency in public discourse with the preservation of fundamental rights is critical. Citizens and policymakers alike must engage in open dialogue to ensure this law does not become a tool for oppression.
Freedom of speech in Nigeria should be more than just ink on paper—it must be actively protected and respected.
Read: Papa Ajasco’s Memorable Airport Encounter with President Tinubu
Comments 3